The Soul of Man

En este ensayo, The Soul of Man under Socialism, Oscar Wilde ejercita su poder de convicción sobre el socialismo como medida de escape a la pobreza y al individualismo. Que el hombre ve la horrible pobreza alrededor y trata de solucionarla. Que lo que hay que cambiar es la sociedad. Que el socialismo cambiará las condiciones de vida de la gente. Señoras y señores… Oscar Wilde:

The chief advantage that would result from the establishment of Socialism is, undoubtedly, the fact that Socialism would relieve us from that sordid necessity of living for others which, in the present condition of things, presses so hardly upon almost everybody.  In fact, scarcely anyone at all escapes.

Now and then, in the course of the century, a great man of science, like Darwin; a great poet, like Keats; a fine critical spirit, like M. Renan; a supreme artist, like Flaubert, has been able to isolate himself, to keep himself out of reach of the clamorous claims of others, to stand ‘under the shelter of the wall,’ as Plato puts it, and so to realize the perfection of what was in him, to his own incomparable gain, and to the incomparable and lasting gain of the whole world.  These, however, are exceptions.  The majority of people spoils their lives by an unhealthy and exaggerated altruism—are forced, indeed, so to spoil them.  They find themselves surrounded by repugnant poverty, by hideous ugliness, by hideous starvation.  It is inevitable that they should be strongly moved by all this.  The emotions of man are stirred more quickly than man’s intelligence; and, as I pointed out some time ago in an article on the function of criticism, it is much more easy to have sympathy with suffering than it is to have sympathy with thought.  Accordingly, with admirable, though misdirected intentions, they very seriously and very sentimentally set themselves to the task of remedying the evils that they see.  But their remedies do not cure the disease: they merely prolong it.  Indeed, their remedies are part of the disease.
They try to solve the problem of poverty, for instance, by keeping the poor alive; or, in the case of a very advanced school, by amusing the poor.
But this is not a solution: it is an aggravation of the difficulty.  The proper aim is to try and reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty will be impossible.  And the altruistic virtues have really prevented the carrying out of this aim.  Just as the worst slave-owners were those who were kind to their slaves, and so prevented the horror of the system being realized by those who suffered from it, and understood by those who contemplated it, so, in the present state of things in England, the people who do most harm are the people who try to do most good; and at last we have had the spectacle of men who have really studied the problem and know the life—educated men who live in the East End—coming forward and imploring the community to restrain its altruistic impulses of charity, benevolence, and the like.  They do so on the ground that such charity degrades and demoralizes.  They are perfectly right.  Charity creates a multitude of sins.
There is also this to be said.  It is immoral to use private property in order to alleviate the horrible evils that result from the institution of private property.  It is both immoral and unfair.
Under Socialism all this will, of course, be altered.  There will be no people living in fetid shelters and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger-pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings.  The security of society will not depend, as it does now, on the state of the weather.  If a frost comes we shall not have a hundred thousand men out of work, walking about the streets in a state of disgusting misery, or asking to their neighbours for money, or crowding round the doors of repugnant shelters to try and secure a piece of bread and a night’s unclean lodging.  Each member of the society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society, and if a frost comes no one will practically be anything the worse… (The Soul of Man under Socialism, essay by Oscar Wilde.)

Gustave Flaubert (1821 - 1880) fue un influyente novelista francés, tal vez el mayor exponente del realismo literario en su país. Es conocido especialmente por Madame Bovary y por su escrupulosa devoción a su estilo y estética.
Socialismo: sistema caracterizado por posesión social y control democrático de los medios de producción, así como también de ideologías políticas, teorías y movimientos que tienden a su establecimiento. La posesión social se refiere a la posesión pública, propiedad cooperativa, propiedad ciudadana de equidad, o algunas combinaciones de estas.
Related post

Si te gustó este artículo compartilo con tus amigos.